The only “just verdict” is to find Chauvin innocent, Defense says.

Derek Chauvin Murder trial Eric Nelson, a former Minneapolis police counsel, said in the opening discussions on Monday that there are some important battles over how the essential facts of the case are interpreted. I said I would.

Nelson told the jury that the most important of those battles was the debate over the cause of Floyd’s death. Prosecutors say Chauvin is responsible for killing Floyd — but lawyers say Floyd’s health problems and substance use worsened his heart condition, and Chauvin should be exempt. is.

“Evidence shows that Mr. Floyd died of high blood pressure, his coronary artery disease, methamphetamine and fentanyl intake, and cardiac arrhythmias resulting from adrenaline flowing through his body-all of which are already in the heart. I was hurt. “

“Evidence shows that when he confronted the police, he put the drug in his mouth to hide the drug from the police,” Nelson said of Floyd’s actions on the day he died.

The jury weighs the evidence against the law and “applies reason and common sense,” Nelson said. “There is only one verdict, which is to acquit Chauvin.”

Chauvin, 45, faces three criminal charges. Manslaughter.

Prosecution Said at the beginning of Monday Chauvin did not support his oath and did not follow police training in the use of force against Floyd. Special Aide Jerry Blackwell said Chauvin “used excessive and unreasonable force on George Floyd’s body.”

Blackwell also questioned the proportion of police response, noting that five armed police officers were on the scene to deal with unarmed Floyd on the day they died in custody. However, Chauvin’s lawyers said the case began with reports of counterfeit $ 20 bills, but also included illegal drugs and physical struggles that began before Chauvin arrived.

“What you learn is that when police officers sometimes react to routine and minimal events, they often develop into larger and more serious events,” Nelson said.

Attorneys described the police response from the last anniversary as escalating, even before Chauvin arrived. The prosecution showed a video footage of witnesses in court, showing Chauvin holding his knees around Floyd’s neck, but Nelson said other footage of the jury, including surveillance camera footage from Cup Foods. Said to see.

Nelson also said witnesses testified that on the day Floyd died, he believed he was drunk or taking drugs. And he told police that Floyd had told police he was unaffected by any substance.

Nelson said police officers detaining Floyd saw the crowds around them as a threat and believed that Floyd continued to struggle after being detained on the ground.

He described the intersection of East 38th Street and Chicago Avenue where the incident took place as a “high crime area,” and said Nelson said the city had surveillance cameras higher than the street height.

Nelson reiterated to the jury that when police tried to get Floyd into the car, “you could see the Minneapolis police car swinging back and forth,” even from a distance.

“This wasn’t an easy fight,” Nelson said.

Nelson urged the jury to focus on applying reason and common sense to the evidence presented. He said the evidence was vast and much wider than what they saw in the video footage showing the last 10 minutes of Floyd’s encounter with the police.

“At the end of this case, we will spend a lot of time talking about suspicions,” Nelson told the jury.

Copyright 2021 NPR. For more information, please visit

The only “just verdict” is to find Chauvin innocent, Defense says.

Source link The only “just verdict” is to find Chauvin innocent, Defense says.

Related Articles

Back to top button