Washington (AP) —The Supreme Court has not immediately blocked Texas law prohibiting most abortions, but agreed to hear the proceedings in early November.
The judge said Friday that the federal government would decide whether it had the right to sue the law.
For the time being, the court proceedings leave the law saying that the clinic has helped reduce abortion by 80% in the second largest state in the United States. The law prohibits abortion, usually about 6 weeks after pregnancy, after cardiac activity is detected. That was before some women knew they were pregnant.
Judge Sonia Sotomayor wrote that she would have now blocked the law.
This is the latest news update. The previous story of AP is as follows.
Washington (AP) —The Biden administration, which is in the final stages of blocking most of Texas’s abortion bans, has warned the Supreme Court that the decision would not be safe if it allowed state law to come into force.
The High Court is considering the Justice Department’s request to put the law on hold, at least until the court battle is resolved. Judges can act at any time.
The law has been in force since September, with the exception of a district court order suspension that lasted only 48 hours, and when heart activity is detected, some women become pregnant, usually for about six weeks. Abortion is prohibited before you know that you are.
It was long before the Supreme Court’s major abortion ruling allowed the state to ban abortion, but the court issued an abortion from Mississippi in the Roe v. Wade case and the planned parent-child relationship vs. Casey case. I agreed to hear an appeal requesting dismissal.
However, Texas law was written to avoid early federal court reviews by putting its enforcement in the hands of civilians rather than state officials.
If the law remains in force, “this court’s decision is not safe. States do not have to follow precedents they disagree with, or even disagree. They simply exercise the rights they dislike. It may be outlawed. “
For about 24 weeks, before the time when the foetation could survive outside the womb, the ban on abortion enforced by other states was blocked by the court because it contradicted the Supreme Court’s case.
“Texas shouldn’t get different results simply by combining unconstitutionality with an unprecedented enforcement scheme designed to circumvent the traditional mechanism of judicial review,” the government wrote.
The day before, the state said the federal government lacked the power to file a proceeding to challenge Texas’ ban and asked the court to leave the law in place.
The Justice Department filed a lawsuit after the Supreme Court refused previous efforts to temporarily suspend the measures taken by the abortion provider.
In early October, Judge Robert Pittman of the US District Court ruled, put the law on hold, and allowed the resumption of abortion.
Two days later, three judges from the 5th US Circuit Court of Appeals enforced the law.
The administration also wants judges to take up and rule the constitution of the law, even if the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals has not yet done so. The Supreme Court rarely grants such a request.
Texas opposed early consideration by the High Court, but said the proceedings should be used to directly dismiss Law and Casey’s decisions if the judge agrees with the Biden administration’s request. ..
The court has already heard discussions on December 1 in a case in which Mississippi has asked the court to revoke these two decisions.
Suggest a fix
Supreme Court does not block Texas abortion law and sets trial
Source link Supreme Court does not block Texas abortion law and sets trial