New York (AP) —The top leader of the American Catholic Bishops’ Council has faithfully called on Friday to pray and fast, hoping that the Supreme Court is on track to overturn the constitutional rights of abortion. But even among Catholics who oppose abortion, there is some concern about the consequences of such a ruling.
A recently leaked draft Supreme Court opinion suggests that a majority of the nine judges are ready to overturn the 1973 Roe v. Wade decision.
Some Catholics who oppose abortion say such a result would be the answer to their prayers. Others say that Catholic leaders “prolife” by moving away from the political party wings of the anti-abortion movement and supporting a wide range of policies to set up safety nets for unmarried mothers and low-income families. I warn you that the concept of “” should be expanded.
Madison Chastain, a Catholic blogger and advocate of disability, states that he opposes abortion, but opposes overturning abortion and criminalizing it.
Factors that cause abortion include lack of comprehensive sex education, poor health care, and workplace inequality.
“Illegal abortion before dealing with these injustices kills women, because women continue to have abortions in secret and unsafe,” she wrote.
Journalist and Jesuit priest Sam Sawyer says he is an “enthusiastic anti-abortion advocate” in favor of Rho’s reversal. Still, he responded to the leak with an essay listing why supporters of the right to abortion are so wary of the prospect.
“The pro-life movement and its political alliances are perceived not only as abortion itself, but also as a standard of democracy, a judicial commitment to civil rights, and a threat to women’s health and economic security,” Sawyer said. I wrote in Jezus magazine. He is a senior editor.
Republican politicians, backed by leaders against abortion, “have used the life of the fetus as a moral cover to ignore other calls for justice,” Sawyer wrote. “The Political Alliance of the Pro-Life Movement has eradicated a social safety net program that makes it easier for women to carry their pregnancy to maturity.”
The call for Fasting and Prayer Day came from Archbishop Jose Gomez of Los Angeles, the chair of the Episcopal Conference of the United States, and Archbishop William Lori of Baltimore, chair of the USCCB’s Pro Life Activities Committee.
They sought prayers for Roe’s overthrow and “conversion of the hearts and minds of those who advocate abortion.”
After the Supreme Court leak, the archbishops repeated calls from other Catholic leaders who suggested that Roe’s reversal should be linked to increased and supportive support for pregnant women and new mothers.
Lori emphasized a USCCB program called “Walking with a Troublesome Mom,” and the church “to accompany women and couples facing unexpected or difficult pregnancies, and in the early days of parents. In the meantime, he said that effort should be doubled.
The Bishop Conference has designated the “Abortion Threat” as its top priority. This is a perspective that many Catholics do not share. According to a Pew Research Center study, 56% of Catholics in the United States say that abortion is legal in all or most of the time.
Professor O. Carter Sneed, a professor of law and politics at the University of Notre Dame, said that most Catholics engaged in anti-abortion activities “are not strict political parties, but take care of moms and babies in some way. People who are. Available. “
As an example, Sneed quoted the University of Notre Dame’s Center for Ethics and Culture (directed by him) and one of its initiatives, “Women and Children First: Imagine the World of Postrow.” This initiative aims to strengthen support for “women, children (born and unborn), and families in need” through education, research and public participation.
However, Sneed admitted that achieving wide-ranging bipartisan cooperation with such an initiative may not come soon.
“Unfortunately, it’s true that Republicans are the only party that is willing to partner to provide legal protection to the fetus,” he said.
Chad Pecknold, a professor of theology at the Catholic University of America, also suspected that there might be a post-Rho bipartisan surge in abortion.
“As long as the Democrats claim abortion for nine months of pregnancy and the Republicans admit that the abortion violates the Article 14 amendment, this will continue to be a partisan issue,” he said in an email.
“But the goals of the pro-life movement were never partisan,” Pecknold added. “The goal is justice for newborns who have the right to live, to be loved, and to be raised in the family.”
Bishop Joseph Strickland of Tyler, Texas – a frank critic of Catholic politicians who support the right to abortion – said that the opposition to abortion was “to support and care for mothers in difficult situations. Must be. “
“I hope we move to a place where both mother and child are sacred and society supports both lives in every possible way,” he said in an email.
David Gibson, director of the Religious and Cultural Center at Fordham University, questioned the importance of recent promises by Catholic bishops and other anti-abortion leaders to help support unmarried mothers. ..
“Can this movement, which is highly linked to the Republican Party and the conservative movement, suddenly pivot to mobilizing the public for socially free policies?” Gibson said in subsidized childcare and Asked by mentioning programs such as paid maternity leave.
Stephen Millies, a professor of public theology at the Catholic Theological Union in Chicago, says the bishops are partially responsible for the established polarization of abortion.
“It’s unrealistic to think that the habit of division is abandoned,” says Millies, and bishops are more to reduce abortion by clamoring for stronger and more funded social programs. I suggested that I might have done that.
Rebecca Bratten Weiss, a writer and digital editor for Catholic magazine in the United States, said she no longer calls herself “professional life.” However, she believes that she has been active in her movement for many years and that all life is worthy of protection.
“People working to overthrow Roe have made it very clear that they have no interest in expanding the safety net,” she said. “They aren’t thinking about the outcome, or the outcome is okay. More women are seeking unsafe abortions due to higher infant mortality rates, and more families are being driven by desperate measures.”
Jesuit priest Thomas Reese, who writes to the Religious News Agency, said the egg reversal should be an opportunity for reassessment by many bishops who accepted the Republican Party for their opposition to abortion. Suggested in the column.
“Catholic bishops will celebrate this victory they have worked for decades, but ironically it should lead to a divorce between the bishop and Republicans,” Reese wrote. “The Republicans have nothing else to offer them. In fact, with the exception of abortion, the proposal is the opposite of Catholic social education.”
Assuming Roe capsized, Reese added: “
However, Reese suspects this may happen.
“My guess is that they will continue to fight unless there is a consensus in the United States regarding abortion,” he wrote. “This means sticking to the Republicans and sacrificing all other priorities.”
The Associated Press’s religious coverage is funded by Lily Endowment, Inc. and is supported through a collaboration between AP and The Conversation US. AP is solely responsible for this content.
Suggest a fix
Some Catholic abortion enemies are worried about capsizing their eggs. WGN Radio 720
Source link Some Catholic abortion enemies are worried about capsizing their eggs. WGN Radio 720