US & World

Senate votes in favor of Roe v. Wade are expected to be inadequate – Chicago Tribune

The Senate rushed on Wednesday and failed an almost certain vote to enshrine access to Roe v. Wade abortion as federal law.

Rollcall declares a constitutional right to abortion services, but is at significant risk of being overturned by the conservative Supreme Court, a parliament to maintain the court’s ruling nearly 50 years ago. Promised to be the first of several efforts in.

President Joe Biden has called on Democratic-controlled parliament to pass a bill to protect millions of Americans’ abortion services. However, the majority of his party does not seem to be able to overcome the Republican filibuster, which has set up a conservative Supreme Court judge and has worked for decades to end the Roe v. Wade case.

“The position of the Biden administration was clear from day one. It defends the constitutional rights of women granted in the Roe v. Wade case,” White House Deputy Press Secretary Karine Jean-Pierre said prior to the vote.

Congress has been fighting for abortion policy for years, but after a conservative majority disclosed the Supreme Court’s draft opinion to overturn Roe’s decision, which many believed would resolve the bill. A vote on the bill passed on Wednesday gave new urgency.

The outcome of the court’s actual ruling, expected this summer, will surely echo national and campaign trajectories ahead of the fall midterm elections, which determine which party will control parliament.

Democratic senators have stood on the Senate floor one by one, arguing that revoking access to abortion would be of great harm to women, not just women, but to families and all Americans planning the future. I did.

Senator Catherine Cortez Mast (D-Nev.) Knows only the world where most American women are guaranteed access to abortion, but may face the future with less rights than their mothers and grandmothers. Said.

“That means women can’t control their lives and bodies like men, and that’s wrong,” she said in preparation for Wednesday’s vote.

Filibusters are almost certain to participate in filibuster to stop the bill from proceeding, but few Republican senators are in favor of terminating access to abortion. You need 60 votes to move forward in a 50-50 split chamber.

Senate Republican leader Mitch McConnell is the designer of an effort to set up a conservative judge in the Supreme Court, including three from the Trump era, in an effort to downplay the consequences of potential changes in federal abortion policy. I’ve been.

“This issue will be dealt with at the state level,” McConnell said.

Other Republicans, including Senator John Thune of South Dakota, argue that the bill passed in the House is more extreme than Law and will extend access to abortion beyond other major countries around the world. There is.

About half of the states have already approved legislation that further limits or prohibits abortion. This includes several triggering laws that come into effect after a court ruling.

Opinion polls show that most Americans want to maintain access to abortion in the early stages of pregnancy, and the view on late abortion is more subtle and complex.

The draft decision on the Mississippi proceedings suggests that the majority of conservative judges are ready to end the federal right to abortion, leaving it up to the state to decide.

Whatever the Supreme Court says this summer, it almost guarantees a new stage in parliamentary political battles over abortion policies, filibuster rules, and the most fundamental rights to health care, privacy, and fetal protection. Probably.

In recent years, the abortion debate has become a political draw in Congress. The bill is issued for voting — to expand or limit services — either failing in line with party policy or being removed from the wider legislative package.

The Parliament, which was expected to be chaired by Vice President Kamala Harris, was in tight security and was strengthened across from the Supreme Court after protesters came into force at the draft meeting last week.

After the Supreme Court first signaled that the Democratic-dominated House of Representatives is considering the issue by enacting a ban on Texas law, legislators voted mostly for partisan health last year. Approved the protection law.

However, the bill was sluggish in the Senate and was evenly divided under the naked rule of democracy, as Harris was able to cast the same number of votes.

60 votes are needed to overcome the filibuster, and Wednesday’s results are expected to be inadequate, at least in this case calling for a change in the Senate rules to abolish the horizontal bar threshold. ..

A conservative Democrat, Senator Joe Manchin of West Virginia, told reporters that he would support maintaining the Roe v. Wade case, but wouldn’t vote that the bill was too wide.

Two Republican senators (Lisa Murkowski of Alaska and Susan Collins of Maine facing her own reelection in November) also support the access to the Supreme Court to counter the potential actions of the Supreme Court. Suggest your own more coordinated approach and don’t vote.

Both Republican senators who voted to confirm most of the judges of former President Donald Trump are discussing alternatives. But the Democrats have largely panned Collins Markowski’s efforts as inadequate. “

“I will continue to work with my colleagues on the law to maintain the current legal framework for abortion rights in this country,” Collins said in a statement. No, “he said.

Two Republican senators are being pressured to join most Democrats to change the rules of filibuster, which seems unlikely.

Five years ago, after Barack Obama prevented Barack Obama from choosing Merrick Garland to fill a vacant seat in the Supreme Court at the start of the 2016 presidential election, he abolished filibuster and abolished filibuster. It was McConnell who changed the rules of the Senate to do so. Trump to fill after he wins the White House.

Both parties are facing great pressure to convince voters that they are doing everything they can as the fall elections approach.

Parliamentary campaign committees are working hard to raise funds for abortion issues and invigorate voters who are already ready to get involved.

Associated Press writers Mary Clare Jalonick, Kevin Freking, Darlene Superville, Farnoush Amiri in Washington, and David Sharp in Maine contributed to this report.

Senate votes in favor of Roe v. Wade are expected to be inadequate – Chicago Tribune

Source link Senate votes in favor of Roe v. Wade are expected to be inadequate – Chicago Tribune

Related Articles

Back to top button