Australia ranks worst in reducing greenhouse gas emissions compared to the other 23 countries, according to a bitter report on the Morrison government’s climate change policy.
This was after a groundbreaking UN report by an intergovernmental panel on climate change discovered that Australia had risen 1.4 degrees Celsius. Higher than the world average of 1.1C..
Dr. Hugh Sadler, ANU’s Honorary Associate Professor at Crawford School of Public Policy, ranked the achievements of 23 OECD countries and Russia on eight climate indicators.
On the pitiful report card of the Australian Institute, The back of the packHe found that Australia was ranked 20th or lower in 7 of the 8 categories, and from a relative point of view, no improvement has been made in any of the categories since 2005.
“Australia is not leading the competition for emission reductions in our economy, according to research, and is lagging behind the herds of developed countries,” he said.
Dr. Sadler found that between 2005 and 2019 (Precovid) Australia performed worse than any of the other 23 countries in reducing its overall dependence on fossil fuels for energy. Did.
In fact, the Australian economy remains the highest-emission energy system of any OECD country, with the exception of Poland.
“Despite the growth of solar and wind energy over the last decade, fossil fuels still dominate Australia’s energy sector, with the worst electrification rates in the OECD to emit coal, oil and gas for energy. It’s one, “says Dr. Sadler. Said.
The report found that Australia’s reliance on fossil fuels for energy has actually increased since 2005, with the energy sector now accounting for the majority of its carbon dioxide emissions.
Energy combustion emissions accounted for 58% of national emissions in 2005, but nearly three-quarters (72%) in 2019, with Australia from 2005 to 2019.
The report challenged the Morrison government’s claim that it did more to reduce greenhouse gas emissions than other countries and the Paris Agreement’s commitment to prioritize productivity.
The Australian Institute reports that Australia has less energy productivity gains than any of the other 23 countries.
“For the past 15 years, Australia, unlike many other OECD countries, has wasted a great opportunity to separate its energy sector from fossil fuels. As a result, Australians have polluted and inefficient electricity, They are forced to heat, dwell and transport, which also boosts our living costs and reduces our energy productivity, “said Dr. Sadler.
“Beyond comparisons with other countries, this report states that Australia’s so-called” gas-fired economic recovery “is completely against Australia’s energy system migration needs, further exacerbating Australia’s emission reduction performance. It shows that it is only useful. “
George Brandis, a former Liberal Minister and now High Commissioner of the United Kingdom, also said that Australia is “committed to the leadership of green technology we need, so Net Zero is virtually achievable around the world. There is, “and was accused on Twitter.
The report was released when the United Nations published a disturbing study from the IPCC, where temperatures could rise by up to 1.7 ° C within the next 20 years and 2 ° C within 40 years, even under minimum emission scenarios. Indicates that it is possible to reach.
Under higher emission scenarios, warming can reach 1.9 ° C within 20 years.
UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres said the internationally agreed threshold of 1.5 ° C was “dangerously close.”
“We are at immediate risk of reaching 1.5 degrees in the short term,” he said.
Australian Institute and Hugh Saddler found Australia lags behind the OECD in reducing climate change
Source link Australian Institute and Hugh Saddler found Australia lags behind the OECD in reducing climate change